基于造型形式与主题的竹盆景审美偏好研究

刘格言; 梁雨苗; 潘品妤; 白桐; 郭松龄; 路阳成; 唐海雄; 江明艳

doi:10.12390/jbr2022089

基于造型形式与主题的竹盆景审美偏好研究

doi: 10.12390/jbr2022089

四川农业大学风景园林学院, 四川成都 611130

基金项目:

四川省科技计划重点研发项目(2021YFYZ0006)

四川省大学生创新训练计划项目(S202210626111)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘格言，硕士研究生，从事竹类植物园林应用研究。E-mail：holiday.lgy@qq.com。

通讯作者:
江明艳,教授,博士,从事竹类植物培育与应用研究。E-mail:jmy@sicau.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 153
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-06

Research on Aesthetic Preference of Bamboo Bonsai Based on Modeling Form and Theme

College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China

摘要

摘要: 【目的】为了探寻人群对叠加文化内涵与否的、不同造型形式和主题的竹盆景的审美偏好及其影响因素以及视觉行为特征。【方法】该研究创作出5种造型形式和6类造型主题的30个竹盆景，将受试者分为N组(观赏无任何文字说明的竹盆景)和Y组(观赏有题名和文化内涵简介的竹盆景)，采用美景度评价法和语义差异法研究两组人群对竹盆景的审美偏好差异及影响因素；采用眼动分析法研究两组人群观赏竹盆景的视觉行为特征。【结果】(1)Y组竹盆景审美偏好得分(5.52)显著高于N组(5.38)。(2)N组竹盆景审美偏好=0.801+0.260×要素协调性+0.236×画境美+0.113×精致感+0.099×造型创新性+0.076×自然美+0.070×层次感。Y组竹盆景审美偏好=0.206+0.298×画境美+0.161×精致感+0.158×要素协调性+0.157×文化特色性+0.090×自然美+0.086×题名契合度。(3)N组平均注视时长(0.88 s)极显著大于Y组(0.78 s)，N组注视次数(12.06 n)、首次进入注视时间(0.59 s)和总扫视幅度(35.90°)极显著小于Y组(13.00 n、0.84 s、45.42°)。(4)N组审美偏好影响因素与平均注视时长和注视次数存在相关关系。Y组审美偏好影响因素与平均注视时长、注视次数、首次进入注视时间以及总扫视幅度存在相关关系。【结论】叠加文化内涵能显著提高竹盆景的审美偏好得分，并改变被试者在观赏时的视觉行为特征，研究结果可为未来竹盆景创作和审美评价提供参考，促进竹盆景产业的发展。
- 竹盆景 /
- 造型形式 /
- 造型主题 /
- 审美偏好 /
- 美景度评价法 /
- 语义差异法 /
- 眼动分析法
Abstract: 【Objective】In order to explore the aesthetic preference，influencing factors and visual behavior characteristics of bamboo bonsai with different modeling forms and themes with or without cultural connotation. 【Method】30 bamboo bonsais with 5 modeling forms and 6 modeling themes were created in this study，and the subjects were divided into group N (viewing bamboo bonsai without any text description) and Y group (viewing the bamboo bonsai with title and a brief introduction to its cultural connotation). The difference and influencing factors of the two groups of people's aesthetic preference for bamboo bonsai were studied by using the scenic beauty estimation method and the semantic differential method. The visual behavior characteristics of the two groups of people viewing bamboo bonsai was studied by using the eye movement analysis method. 【Result】(1) The aesthetic preference score of bamboo bonsai in Y group (5.52) was significantly higher than that in N group (5.38). (2) N group bamboo bonsai aesthetic preference=0.801+0.260×element coordination+0.236×beauty of picturesque scene+0.113×exquisite+0.099×modeling innovation+0.076×natural beauty+0.070×Sense of level. Y group bamboo bonsai aesthetic preference=0.206+0.298×beauty of picturesque scene+0.161×exquisite+0.158×element coordination+0.157×cultural characteristics+0.090×natural beauty+0.086×title fit. (3)The average fixation duration of group N (0.88 s) was significantly longer than that of group Y (0.78 s)，and the fixation count (12.06 n)，first fixation time (0.59 s) and total saccade amplitude (35.90°) in group N were significantly lower than those in group Y (13.00 n，0.84 s，45.42°). (4) The influencing factors of aesthetic preference in group N were correlated with the average duration of fixation and the number of fixation. The influencing factors of aesthetic preference in group Y were correlated with the average duration of fixation，the number of fixation，the time to first fixation and the total amplitude of saccades. 【Conclusion】The superimposed cultural connotation can significantly improve the aesthetic preference score of bamboo bonsai，and change the visual behavior characteristics of the subjects when viewing. The research results can provide a reference for the future creation and aesthetic evaluation of bamboo bonsai，and promote the development of the bamboo bonsai industry.
- Bamboo bonsai /
- Modeling form /
- Modeling theme /
- Aesthetic preference /
- SBE /
- SD /
- Eye-tracking

HTML全文

参考文献(49)

蔡建国,韩春,舒美英,等. 观赏竹盆景艺术创作研究[J]. 河北林果研究,2006,21(1):88-91.

邓庆城,包尚理. 潇洒飘逸的竹子盆景[J]. 花木盆景(盆景赏石),2001(4):19.

范鹤鸣. "根茎竹"盆景制作与养护[J]. 中国花卉园艺,2015(6):32-33.

韩素芹. 竹类盆景的制作与养护[J]. 园林,2006,12(4):48.

贺淦荪. 论盆景的鉴赏[J]. 花木盆景(花卉园艺),1995,7(4):18-19.

黄楚. 广西盆景精品展作品调查与审美评价研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2017.

矫明阳,高凤,郝培尧,等. 基于SD法的城市带状公园植物景观评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2013,28(5):185-190.

雷翻宇. 基于SD法的园林植物景观评价研究——以广西财经学院相思湖校区为例[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(5):858-862.

李浩. 不可居无竹——盆栽竹子的栽培与管护[J]. 花木盆景(花卉园艺),2012(11):42-43.

李杰. 城市休闲空间绿视率及其景观评价[D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2017.

李娜,崔兰明,薛勇. 哈尔滨市彩叶花灌木景观分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2017,45(22):120-122

,150.

李强. 神话传说资源对旅游目的地品牌塑造作用的研究——兼论山西旅游品牌形象建设[J]. 文化创新比较研究,2021,5(33):166-169.

李瑞聪,曾秀珍,周琳,等. 基于SBE与SD法的珍贵树种视觉景观评价研究[J]. 东南园艺,2016,4(2):68-72.

马伯钦. 竹盆景的艺术魅力[J]. 中国花卉盆景,2013(5):72-73.

彭春生,李淑萍. 盆景学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2018.

宋爱春,孙玉红,肖鸿堉,等. 北京玉渊潭樱花景观评价模型构建[J]. 西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):251-256.

王平. 中国竹文化[M]. 北京:民族出版社,2001.

韦金笙. 中国盆景史略[J]. 中国园林,1991,7(2):11-20.

吴再兴,李欣. 竹类盆景技术研究进展[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2007,36(3):59-62.

阎国利. 眼动分析法在广告心理学研究中的应用[J]. 心理学动态,1999,17(4):50-53.

杨淑兮. 竹石盆景艺术表现及造型探究[J]. 现代园艺,2009(1):35-38.

赵丽艳,王有宁,汪殿蓓. 基于SBE法的孝感市公园植物配置研究[J]. 现代园艺,2013,5(1):16-18.

钟姝,赵曜,李雄,等. 基于SBE法的北京植物园月季园植物组群美学评价[J]. 中国城市林业,2020,18(1):66-70.

Behe B,Huddleston P,Childs K,et al. Seeing through the forest:The gaze path to purchase[J]. PLOS ONE,2020,15(10):e0240179.

Behe B K,Bae M,Huddleston P T,et al. The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2015,24(1):10-21.

Conniff A,Craig T. A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2016,19:103-109.

Daniel T,Boster R. Measuring Landscape Esthetics:The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method[J]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper,1976.

Deng L,Luo H,Ma J,et al. Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,53:126702.

Dupont L,Antrop M,Eetvelde V V. Does landscape related expertise influence the visual perception of landscape photographs? Implications for participatory landscape planning and management[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2015,141:68-77.

Dupont L,Ooms K,Antrop M,et al. Testing the validity of a saliency-based method for visual assessment of constructions in the landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2017a,167:325-338.

Dupont L,Ooms K,Duchowski A T,et al. Investigating the visual exploration of the rural-urban gradient using eye-tracking[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation,2017b,17(1-2):65-88.

Elsadek M,Sun M,Sugiyama R,et al. Cross-cultural comparison of physiological and psychological responses to different garden styles[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2019,38:74-83.

Franěk M,Petružálek J,Šefara D. Eye movements in viewing urban images and natural images in diverse vegetation periods[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2019,46:126477.

Gao T,Liang H Y,Chen Y X,et al. Comparisons of Landscape Preferences through Three Different Perceptual Approaches[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,16(23):4754.

Gao Y,Zhang T,Zhang W K,et al. Research on visual behavior characteristics and cognitive evaluation of different types of forest landscape spaces[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,54:126788.

Guo S L,Sun W,Chen W,et al. Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception:An Eye-Tracking Study[J]. Land,2021,10(10):1102.

Hartig T,Staats H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2006,26(3):215-226.

Huang A S H,Lin Y J. The effect of landscape colour,complexity and preference on viewing behaviour[J]. Landscape Research,2020,45(2):214-227.

Landis J R,Koch G G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data[J]. Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.

Lu S S,Wu F,Wang Z J,et al. Evaluation system and application of plants in healing landscape for the elderly[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2021,58:126969.

Lund H. Eye tracking in library and information science:a literature review[J]. Library Hi Tech,2016,34(4):585-614.

Mao B,Gong L,Xu C Y. Evaluating the Scenic Beauty of Individual Trees:A Case Study Using a Nonlinear Model for a Pinus Tabulaeformis Scenic Forest in Beijing,China[J]. Forests,2015,6(6):1933-1948.

Noland R B,Weiner M D,Gao D,et al. Eye-tracking technology,visual preference surveys,and urban design:preliminary evidence of an effective methodology[J]. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,2017,10(1):98-110.

Polat A T,Akay A. Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2015,14(3):573-582.

Sun L,Shao H,Li S Y,et al. Integrated Application of Eye Movement Analysis and Beauty Estimation in the Visual Landscape Quality Estimation of Urban Waterfront Park[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2018,32(9):1856010.

Van Den Berg A E,Joye Y,Koole S L. Why viewing nature is more fascinating and restorative than viewing buildings:A closer look at perceived complexity[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2016,20:397-401.

Xiang Y,Liang H Y,Fang X Y,et al. The comparisons of on-site and off-site applications in surveys on perception of and preference for urban green spaces:Which approach is more reliable?[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2021,58:126961.

Zhang Z,Qie G F,Wang C,et al. Relationship between Forest Color Characteristics and Scenic Beauty:Case Study Analyzing Pictures of Mountainous Forests at Sloped Positions in Jiuzhai Valley,China[J]. Forests,2017,8(3):63.

Zheng J M,Tarin M W K,Jiang D H,et al. Which ornamental features of bamboo plants will attract the people most?[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2021,61:127101.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计