刺竹炭灰分含量影响因素及表征研究

邵远超; 田华宇; 王国睿; 郝海彦; 张敏; 张文标

doi:10.12390/jbr2022081

刺竹炭灰分含量影响因素及表征研究

doi: 10.12390/jbr2022081

1. 浙江农林大学化学与材料工程学院, 浙江杭州 311300;
2. 四川惊雷科技股份有限公司, 四川宜宾 644000

基金项目:

浙江省省级重点研发计划项目(2021C03146)

详细信息

作者简介:
邵远超，硕士研究生，从事新型材料与工程技术研究。E-mail：shao19981211@163.com。

通讯作者:
张文标,教授,博士,从事竹炭理论和应用研究。E-mail:zwb@zafu.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 165
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-23

Study on Influencing Factors and Characterization of Ash Content of Bambusa sinospinosa Charcoal

1. College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China;
2. Jinglei Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Yibin 644000, Sichuan, China

摘要

摘要: 为了更好地应用刺竹炭，开发高附加值产品，对刺竹灰分、微观形貌等进行研究。笔者以刺竹作为原料，采用单因素实验法研究刺竹不同的立地条件、竹龄、部位、炭化工艺等对刺竹炭灰分的影响，并通过傅里叶红外吸收光谱(FTIR)、电镜(SEM)、比表面积及孔隙结构测试(BET)、元素分析(ICP)等研究刺竹和刺竹炭官能团、微观结构及元素含量变化情况，结果表明：(1)最低灰分条件为阴坡下坡3 a基部刺竹，炭化工艺为5 ℃·min^-1升温速率下炭化温度500 ℃、炭化时间2 h，灰分含量为4.36%；最高灰分条件为阳坡上坡5 a梢部刺竹，炭化工艺为5 ℃·min^-1升温速率下炭化温度1000 ℃、炭化时间4 h，灰分含量为8.80%。刺竹灰分含量阳坡略大于阴坡，上坡到下坡、梢部到基部灰分含量递减，随竹龄、炭化温度、时间增加灰分含量递增。(2)红外吸收光谱表明刺竹炭化后部分峰值变弱，不同条件刺竹炭化后峰值差异并不明显；元素分析结果表明不同条件刺竹元素含量相差较小，炭化后元素含量下降，随炭化温度升高元素含量略微降低。(3)炭化后刺竹炭形貌变得相对光滑平整，轮廓清晰；随着炭化温度升高，孔隙结构增加较明显，比表面积、总孔容、微孔容、孔容率都呈上升趋势，低灰分条件刺竹经炭化后的刺竹炭比表面积大于高灰分条件刺竹经炭化后的刺竹炭。
- 立地条件 /
- 刺竹 /
- 炭化工艺 /
- 刺竹炭 /
- 灰分含量
Abstract: In order to better use of Bambusa sinospinosa charcoal and develop a high value-added product, the research on relationship among bamboo ash content, microstructure and other manufactureing processes were conducted. The effects of different site conditions, bamboo age, position and carbonization process on the ash content of B. sinospinosa charcoal were studied by single factor experiment method. The changes of functional groups, microstructure and elemental content of B. sinospinosa and carbon were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), electron microscopy (SEM), BET specific surface area and ICP elemental analysis merthod. The results showed that: (1) The ash content of B. sinospinosa charcoal was the lowest (4.36%) under the following carbonization processing conditions: 3-year-old bamboo timber from the base of the shady slope, heating rate 5 ℃·min^-1, carbonization temperature 500 ℃，2 h. The maximum ash content was 8.80% under the following conditions: 5-year-old bamboo timber from the upper part of the sunny slope，carbonization temperature 1 000 ℃, 4 h, heating rate of 5 ℃·min^-1. The ash content of B. sinospinosa from the sunny slope was slightly higher than that from the shady slope. The ash content of B. sinospinosa decreased from the upper slope to the lower slope and from the tip to the base of bamboo culm，and increased with the increase of bamboo age，carbonization temperature and time. (2)With the increase of carbonization temperature, ash content increased. Infrared absorption spectrum showed that the peak values weakened after carbonization，and there was no significant difference in the peak values under the different carbonization conditions. The results of elemental analysis showed that there was little difference in the elemental content of B. sinospinosa under different conditions, The elemental content decreased after carbonizatio, and decreased slightly with the increase of carbonization temperature. (3)After carbonization, the morphology of B. sinospinosa charcoal became relatively smooth and flat with clear outline. With the increase of carbonization temperature, the pore structure increased significantly, The specific surface area, total pore volume and micropore volume showed an increasing trend, and the pore volume rate also increased. The specific surface area of B. sinospinosa charcoal under the condition of lowest ash content was larger than that under the condition of highest ash content.
- Site conditions /
- Bambusa sinospinosa /
- Carbonized process /
- Charcoal: Ash content /

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	Li W L, Chen Y Q, Wang J Y, et al. Study on Adsorption of Cd2+by Modified Bamboo Charcoal[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2014,955-959:2559-2563.
[2]	Wang Y B, Lu J, Wu J, et al. Adsorptive Removal of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics Using Bamboo Biochar[J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7:12947-12957.
[3]	Gayani B, Perera A D L C, Kottegoda N. Thermodynamic, equilibrium and kinetic studies of adsorption of Rhodamine B onto activated bamboo carbon[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment:Science and Engineering,2017,67:271-283.
[4]	Wei W H, Liang M N, Zhu Z Q, et al. Study on Kinetics and Thermodynamic in Bamboo Charcoal Adsorb Ammonia Nitrogen in Wastewater[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2011,356-360:355-359.
[5]	张文标,徐冲霄,闫国祺,等.竹炭导电性能及应用研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(4):639-646.
[6]	李小晴,江文正,李文珠,等.炭含量对竹炭/高密度聚乙烯复合材料电磁屏蔽和力学性能的影响[J].林业工程学报, 2022, 7(1):130-136.
[7]	章亮,柴伟胜,王珊珊,等.聚氯乙烯/竹炭贴面复合材料的燃烧特性研究[J].中国塑料,2021,35(1):37-46.
[8]	刘文芳,赵磊,崔箫,等.竹炭远红外发射率影响因素研究[J].竹子学报,2019,38(2):47-56.
[9]	Karabaeva M I, Tursunaliyeva M S Q. The study of the ash-content of activated carbons based on vegetable raw materials[J]. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research,2021,10(6):143-145.
[10]	周丹丹.铜在生物炭上的吸附-灰分及小分子有机酸的影响[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2016.
[11]	王彩停.硝基芳香化合物在生物炭上的吸附及还原机制:灰分的作用[D].福州:福建师范大学,2020.
[12]	杨思倩,孙思佳,刘贤淼,等. 24种竹材炭化热值与工业分析[J].林业科学,2021,57(7):175-183.
[13]	陈冠军.竹材力学性能的种间差异及其影响因子研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2019.
[14]	何蕊,邱坚,罗蓓.六种竹材灰分及二氧化硅含量分析[J].世界竹藤通讯,2016,14(4):1-4.
[15]	Pavithra G M, Kumar A, Venkataramana G V. Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss, a Reliable Bamboo Species for Production of Black Diamond Bamboo Charcoal[J]. International Journal of Life Sciences,2021,10(3):200-208.
[16]	陈孝煜.坡度对毛竹林生长的影响[J].防护林科技,2021(6):35-37.
[17]	刘主凰,王水英,林金国,等.不同海拔人工林毛竹材纤维形态和化学成分的差异[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):196-199.
[18]	刘广路,范少辉,郭宝华,等.不同年龄毛竹碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].热带作物学报,2016,37(2):279-285.
[19]	汪仁斌,杜春贵.竹材径向动态力学性能研究[J].林产工业,2018,45(8):14-16 ,22.
[20]	冯芳敏,胡尚连,周振华,等.慈竹生长过程纤维素木质素及灰分动态积累[J].福建林业科技,2015,42(1):7-10 ,25.
[21]	林肖庆,吕豪豪,刘玉学,等.生物质原料及炭化温度对生物炭产率与性质的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(7):1216-1223.
[22]	应伟军,钟金环,赵柯豫,等.水蒸气法刺竹活性炭的制备工艺及性能表征[J].竹子学报,2020,39(3):67-72.
[23]	黄玉威.生物炭微观解剖结构表征及理化性质研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.