不同覆盖模式雷竹林地下茎芽库、生物量和出笋数量特征

高贵宾; 温星; 张小平; 钟浩; 潘雁红; 吴志庄

doi:10.12390/jbr2022058

不同覆盖模式雷竹林地下茎芽库、生物量和出笋数量特征

doi: 10.12390/jbr2022058

高贵宾^1,2,3,
温星^1,2,3,
张小平^1,2,3,
钟浩^1,2,3,
潘雁红^1,2,3,
吴志庄^1,2,3, ,

1. 国家林业和草原局竹子研究开发中心, 浙江杭州 310012;
2. 浙江杭嘉湖平原森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 浙江杭州 310012;
3. 竹林生态与资源利用国家林业和草原局重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310012

基金项目:

国家林业和草原局竹子研究开发中心平台运行项目(ZXPT202201)；林草科技成果国家级推广项目(2020133131)；浙江省院合作项目(2017SY02)

详细信息

作者简介:
高贵宾，助理研究员，硕士，从事竹林培育学研究。Email：anshu998@163.com。

通讯作者:
吴志庄,研究员,博士,从事竹林培育学研究。E-mail:zxpyg2016@126.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 101
- HTML全文浏览量: 20
- PDF下载量: 82
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-25

Characteristics of Rhizome Bud Bank,Rhizome Biomass and Shoot Quantity under Different Mulching Modes of Phyllostachys praecox ‘Prevernalis’

GAO Gui-bin^1,2,3,
WEN Xing^1,2,3,
ZHANG Xiao-ping^1,2,3,
ZHONG Hao^1,2,3,
PAN Yan-hong^1,2,3,
WU Zhi-zhuang^{1,2,3
, ,}

1. China National Bamboo Research Center, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, China;
2. National Long-term Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem in Hangzhou-Jiaxing-Huzhou Plain, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Bamboo Forest Ecology and Resource Utilization of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, China

摘要

摘要: 为创新雷竹林覆盖栽培模式，有效调控竹子地下茎更新，促进竹林可持续经营，比较传统覆盖栽培模式(TM)和间隔覆盖栽培模式(SM)竹林地下茎芽库、生物量和出笋数量特征，探究不同覆盖经营模式对竹林地下茎更新和生长的影响。结果表明：SM芽库总量均在470×10⁴ind.·hm^-2以上，显著高于TM4和TM5(P<0.05)；竹林芽库相对减少率TS1 (TM1 vs SM1)和TS2 (TM2 vs SM2)变化幅度较小，TS3 (TM3 vs SM3)和TS4 (TM4 vs SM4)增大至10%~20%，TS4和TS5 (TM5 vs SM5)增大至20%~40%；SM地下茎生物量整体高于TM，TM9以后地下茎生物量陡然减小(P<0.05)，SM变化则相对缓慢；竹林地下茎生物量相对减少率TS1和TS3不到5%，TS4和TS5陡然增大，其中竹鞭生物量相对减少率TS5超过20%，鞭根生物量相对减少率TS5超过15%；SM、TM竹林出笋重量和出笋数量随覆盖时间延长均呈下降趋势，竹林出笋重量和出笋数量相对减少率均不足2%，相互间无显著差异(P>0.05)。研究发现，间隔覆盖竹林地下茎芽库、生物量与竹笋生产力相对高于传统覆盖竹林，间隔覆盖模式不仅能够维持竹林地下茎芽库、生物量，有利于竹林种群更新，还能够维持一定的竹笋生产力。
- 雷竹 /
- 覆盖模式 /
- 芽库 /
- 生物量 /
- 出笋数量
Abstract: The objective of this study was to innovate the mulching cultivation mode of Phyllostachys praecox Z. D. Chu et C. S. Chao 'Prevernalis’ plantation, effectively regulate the renewal of bamboo rhizome, and promote the sustainable management of bamboo forest. We compared the characteristics of rhizome bud bank, rhizome biomass, and quantity of sprouting shoots under traditional mulching (TM) and spaced mulching (SM) modes. The results showed that the total number of bud bank under SM was more than 470×10⁴ individuals·hm^-2, significantly higher than those under TM modes in 4-year (TM4) and 5-year (TM5) treatments (P<0.05). The relative reduction rate of bamboo bud banks of TM vs SM in TS1 (1-year TM vs 1-year SM) and TS2 (2-year TM vs 2-year SM) increased by 10%-20% in TS3 (3-year TM vs 3-year SM) and TS4 (4-year TM vs 4-year SM), and by 20%-40% in TS4 and TS5 (5-year TM vs 5-year SM). The overall rhizome biomass under SM was higher than that under TM. The rhizome biomass under TM decreased sharply after 3 years of TM (TM3) (P<0.05), whereas this change under SM was relatively slight. The relative reduction rate of bamboo rhizome biomass in TS1 and TS3 was less than 5%, and increased abruptly in TS4 and by more than 20% in TS5. The relative reduction rate of rhizome root biomass in TS5 was more than 15%. The shoot weight and shoot number under SM and TM decreased with increasing mulching period; the relative reduction rates of shoot weight and shoot number were less than 2% and not significantly different among treatments (P>0.05). The rhizome bud bank, rhizome biomass, and bamboo shoot productivity of bamboo stands under SM were higher than those under TM. Therefore, the spaced mulching mode not only maintained the rhizome bud bank and biomass of the bamboo forest, which is conducive to population renewal of the bamboo forest, but also maintained a certain level of bamboo shoot productivity.
- Phyllostachys praecox 'Prevernalis’ /
- Mulching mode /
- Bud bank /
- Biomass /
- Shoot quantity

HTML全文

参考文献(31)

[1]	Zhao J C, Wang B, Li Q, et al. Analysis of soil degradation causes in Phyllostachys edulis forests with different mulching years[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(3):149.
[2]	Li Z C, Zhuang S Y, Gui R Y, et al. Chemical properties and distribution of phytotoxic AL species in intensively cultivated soils of Phyllostachys praecox stands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6):837-844.(In Chinese)
[3]	Xu M J, Zhuang S Y, Gui R Y. Soil hypoxia induced by an organic-material mulching technique stimulates the bamboo rhizome up-floating of Phyllostachys praecox[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):14353.
[4]	Liu Y D, Fan S H, Cai C J, et al. Classification of vegetation degradation degree of Phyllostachys praecox forests under soil-surface mulching[J]. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2017, 36(3):29-38.(In Chinese)
[5]	Cheng L, Sun X, Zhuang S Y et al. Effect of liming on soil nitrogen mineralization of Phyllostachys praecox using lab incubation experiment[J]. Soils, 2013, 45(6):992-998.(In Chinese)
[6]	Gao G B, Zhong H, Pan Y H, et al. Study on morphological plasticity of Phyllostachys praecox cv. prevernalis in different mulching cultivation period (s)[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry&Technology, 2016, 36(5):33-37.(In Chinese)
[7]	Liu L, Chen S L. Research summary of the negative influences of the mulched ecosystem of Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis forests with organic materials[J]. Guihaia, 2009, 29(3):327-330.(In Chinese)
[8]	Zhuang S Y, Ji H B, Cheng L, et al. Effect of liming on loss of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil of Phyllostachys praecox cv. prevernalis stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2014, 34(6):68-71.(In Chinese)
[9]	Guo S, Xu Q F, Shen Z M, et al. Response of soil ammonia-oxidizing organisms on fertilization and mulch in Phyllostachys violascens stands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(3):343-351.(In Chinese)
[10]	Zhang Y Z, He J C, Zheng H J. Effect of fertilizer types and fertilization depth on mulching cultivated Phyllostachys violascens[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2011, 31(3):40-43.(In Chinese)
[11]	Guo Z W, Chen S L, Yang Q P, et al. Effects of mulching management on soil and foliar C, N and P stoichiometry in bamboo (Phyllostachys violascens)[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2014, 26(4):572-580.
[12]	Zhang X P, Zhong Z K, Gai X, et al. Changes of root endophytic bacterial community along a chronosequence of intensively managed Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) forests in subtropical China[J]. Microorganisms, 2019, 7(12):616.
[13]	Li W C, Tian X L, Sheng H Y, et al. Response of bacterial compositions to soil biochemical properties under mulching-intensive management in a Phyllostachys edulis forest[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 150:103436.
[14]	Gao G B, Wu L R, Zhong H, et al. Research review of bamboo forest mulching cultivation[J]. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2013, 32(4):7-11.(In Chinese)
[15]	Gao G B, Zhong H, Tian X L, et al. Shooting law and its correlation with temperature of Phyllostachys ptaecox cv. ptevetnalis in different mulching cultivation periods[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015, 33(3):270-274.(In Chinese)
[16]	Li Y H, Chen S L, Liu L, et al. Study on above-ground biomass of degenerated bamboo forest of Phyllostachys proecox with covering organic material[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(8):102-107.(In Chinese)
[17]	Gao G B, Wu Z Z, Wen X, et al. Bud population characteristics of Phyllostachys praecox 'Prevernalis' under different mulching cultivation periods[J]. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 2018, 47(4):969-974.
[18]	Zhai W L, Yang C B, Zhang X P, et al. Effects of mulching management on biomass of Phyllostachys praecox and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(4):1147-1155.(In Chinese)
[19]	Liu L, Chen S L, Li Y H. Stand structure and bamboo shoot number production based assessment of degradation degree of Phyllostachys praecox covered with organic materials[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2010, 27(1):18-24.(In Chinese)
[20]	Gao G B, Pan Y H, Wu L R, et al. A study on biomass allocation pattern of Phyllostachys praecox in different mulching cultivation periods[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 37(4):663-669.(In Chinese)
[21]	Zhai W L, Zhong Z K, Gao G B, et al. Influence of mulching management on soil bacterial structure and diversity in Phyllostachys praecox stands[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(9):133-142.(In Chinese)
[22]	Riis T, Lambertini C, Olesen B, et al. Invasion strategies in clonal aquatic plants:are phenotypic differences caused by phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation?[J]. Annals of botany, 2010, 106(5):813-822.
[23]	Lenssen J P M, Kleunen M V, Fischer M, et al. Local adaptation of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans to flooding along a small-scale gradient[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004, 92(4):696-706.
[24]	Yu F H, Wang N, He W M, et al. Adaptation of rhizome connections in drylands:increasing tolerance of clones to wind erosion[J]. Annals of botany, 2008, 102(4):571-577.
[25]	Shi J M, Ye X H, Chen F S, et al. Adaptation of bamboo to heterogeneous habitat:phenotypic plasticity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(20):5687-5695.(In Chinese)
[26]	Eckert C G, Dorken M E, Mitchell S A. Loss of sex in clonal populations of a flowering plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae)[J]. Evolution, 1999, 53(4):1079-1092.
[27]	Hendrickson J R, Briske D D. Axillary bud banks of two semiarid perennial grasses:occurrence, longevity, and contribution to population persistence[J]. Oecologia, 1997, 110(4):584-591.
[28]	Jones C S, Watson M A. Heteroblasty and preformation in mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae):developmental flexibility and morphological constraint[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2001, 88(8):1340-1358.
[29]	Zhang J T, Mu C S, Wang D L, et al. Shoot population recruitment from a bud bank over two seasons of undisturbed growth of Leymus chinensis[J]. Botany, 2009, 87(12):1242-1249.
[30]	Xu Q F, Jiang P K. Microbial development in soils under intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) stands[J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(1):33-40.
[31]	Huang Z T, Li Y F, Chang S X, et al. Phytolith-occluded organic carbon in intensively managed Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) stands and implications for carbon sequestration[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 45(8):1019-1025.