Volume 39 Issue 3
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIANG Xiao-yu, FAN Shao-hui, YIN Zi-xu, WANG Shu-mei, GUAN Feng-ying. Identification of Key Areas of Visual Landscape in Yixing Bamboo Sea Based on Sensitivity-Subjective Preference Matrix[J]. JOURNAL OF BAMBOO RESEARCH, 2020, 39(3): 78-90.
Citation: JIANG Xiao-yu, FAN Shao-hui, YIN Zi-xu, WANG Shu-mei, GUAN Feng-ying. Identification of Key Areas of Visual Landscape in Yixing Bamboo Sea Based on Sensitivity-Subjective Preference Matrix[J]. JOURNAL OF BAMBOO RESEARCH, 2020, 39(3): 78-90.

Identification of Key Areas of Visual Landscape in Yixing Bamboo Sea Based on Sensitivity-Subjective Preference Matrix

  • Received Date: 2020-05-08
    Available Online: 2021-07-17
  • In order to identify the key areas of visual landscape in Yixing Bamboo Sea,this paper focused on 11 viewing platforms,where large crowds gathered,in Yixing Bamboo Sea Provincial Forest Park,Jiangsu Province. ArcMap10.2 was used to deal with the three objective components of visual sensitivity,i.e. relative slope (Sa),relative distance (Sd) and probability of occurrence (St),and the landscape visual sensitivity was analyzed. The subjective preference scores of 70 professionals were obtained by using the beauty evaluation method (SBE method),and the results of GIS and SBE methods were combined,the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method was used to construct the sensitivity-subjective preference matrix of the visual landscape in the study area. The 11 viewing platforms in Yixing Bamboo Sea were divided into four visual landscape categories,and relevant suggestions for landscape protection,scenic spot planning and management were made accordingly. The results showed that the landscape sensitivity and subjective preference scores of the Bamboo Botanical Garden and Leisure Pool were high,being the "visual landscape key area". The First Peak in Southern Jiangsu and Jizhao Zen Temple had high subjective preference score and low landscape sensitivity,being the "natural development area". The Source of Taihu Lake,Entrance Square and Dragon Pool (a spring at the top of Mount Jade Maiden) had high landscape sensitivity and low subjective preference score,being the "priority improvement area". The landscape sensitivity and preference score of Lingbo Cable Bridge,Waterfall Pavilion and Bamboo Pavilion were low,they belonged to the "sub-priority improvement area". Through the construction of the matrix,both subjective and objective aspects were taken into account to evaluate the visual landscape,the GIS spatial analysis quantified the abstract visual landscape data,and the subjective preference score reflected the public's real feeling about the visual landscape quality. This may provide a method for landscape visual evaluation and key area identification in tourist areas.
  • loading
  • [1]
    马彦红,袁青,冷红.生态系统服务视角下的景观美学服务评价研究综述与启示[J].中国园林,2017,33(6):99-103.
    [2]
    唐真,刘滨谊.视觉景观评估的研究进展[J].风景园林,2015(9):113-120.
    [3]
    黄若愚.论环境美学与景观美学的联系与区别[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(4):84-92.
    [4]
    李雪莹,齐童,张国庆,等.国内外视觉景观影响评价综述[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,38(5):62-69.
    [5]
    王前进,王希群,陆诗雷,等.生态补偿的经济学理论基础及中国的实践[J].林业经济,2019,41(1):3-23.
    [6]
    朱鹤,唐承财,王磊,等.新时代的旅游资源研究:保护利用与创新发展——旅游地理青年学者笔谈[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(4):992-1016.
    [7]
    杜文武,卿腊梅,吴宇航,等.公园城市理念下森林生态系统服务功能提升[J].风景园林,2020,27(10):43-50.
    [8]
    马冰然,曾维华,解钰茜.自然公园功能分区方法研究——以黄山风景名胜区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(22):8286-8298.
    [9]
    陈慧雯.传统村落景观感知评价研究——以湖北省咸宁市刘家桥村为例[J].城市建筑,2020,17(13):12-17

    ,28.
    [10]
    文克.E.德拉姆施塔德,温迪.J.杰里施塔德,徐凌云,等.景观生态学作为可持续景观规划的框架[J].中国园林,2016,32(4):16-27.
    [11]
    赵文武,王亚萍.1981-2015年我国大陆地区景观生态学研究文献分析[J].生态学报,2016,36(23):7886-7896.
    [12]
    邵钰涵,刘滨谊.城市街道景观视觉美学评价研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(9):17-22.
    [13]
    刘滨谊,范榕.景观空间视觉吸引要素及其机制研究[J].中国园林,2013,29(5):5-10.
    [14]
    谢焕景,梁萍,魏凌伟,等.基于ASG综合法的金牛山综合公园视觉景观评价[J].西北林学院学报,2019,34(6):224-231

    ,248.
    [15]
    马冰倩,徐程扬,崔义.八达岭秋季景观整体色彩组成对美景度的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):258-264.
    [16]
    张国庆,齐童,刘传安,等.视觉景观评价方法的回顾与展望[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,38(3):72-77.
    [17]
    李成,李会云,孔德义,等.园林景观美景度评价研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(11):10-12

    ,17.
    [18]
    莫美颖,邓华锋.福建洪田村森林景观视觉敏感度评价[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(1):232-238.
    [19]
    章侃丰,角媛梅,刘歆,等.基于敏感度-主观偏好矩阵的哈尼梯田视觉景观关键区识别[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3661-3672.
    [20]
    李倩菁,蔡晓梅.新文化地理学视角下景观研究综述与展望[J].人文地理,2017,32(1):23-28

    ,98.
    [21]
    徐青,韩锋.西方文化景观理论谱系研究[J].中国园林,2016,32(12):68-75.
    [22]
    常青,苏王新,王宏.景观生态学在风景园林领域应用的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(11):3991-4002.
    [23]
    邹薇,胡希军,成璐洁,等.上杭县城区道路绿地植物景观评价[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(4):265-272.
    [24]
    王慧,孙磊磊.基于共生理论的乡村景观设计策略研究[J].建筑与文化,2020(11):98-100.
    [25]
    杨洋,黄少伟,唐洪辉.景观评价研究进展[J].林业与环境科学,2018,34(1):116-122.
    [26]
    史云曼,沈钦伟,施磊,等.GIS技术在视觉景观评价中的应用分析[J].南方园艺,2020,31(1):52-54.
    [27]
    Zhang Xiao-Jing,Chen Juan,Li Qiao-Yu,et al. Color quantification and evaluation of landscape aesthetic quality for autumn landscape forest based on visual characteristics in subalpine region of western Sichuan,China[J].Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao=The Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(1).
    [28]
    杨翠霞,曹福存,林林.大连滨海路海岸带美景度评价研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(8):59-62.
    [29]
    崔雪琛,郭晋平.基于视觉敏感度的太原市周边山体破坏面景观生态影响评价研究[J].林业与生态科学,2020,35(2):164-169.
    [30]
    刘江,杨玲,张雪葳.声景感知与历史街区景观评价的关系研究——以福州三坊七巷为例[J].中国园林,2019,35(1):35-39.
    [31]
    赵万民,王华,陈志鹏.景观生态视角下城市湖泊型风景区的保护与利用——基于重庆长寿湖风景区保护规划研究[J].中国园林,2019,35(11):53-58.
    [32]
    洪昕晨,陈凯,朱里莹,等.基于AHP法的文化型旅游景区景观评价——以莆田市湄洲岛为例[J].河南科技学院学报(自然科学版),2016,44(1):28-31.
    [33]
    陈洪凯,方艳,吴楚.风景名胜区景观价值评价方法研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(S2):74-80.
    [34]
    Yu Gao,Tong Zhang,Weikang Zhang,et al. Research on visual behavior characteristics and cognitive evaluation of different types of forest landscape spaces[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,54.
    [35]
    王梦娟,刘智勇,王峰顺,等.基于IPA分析法的老旧住宅综合改造研究——以南京市部分改造示范小区为例[J].工程经济,2020,30(7):21-25.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (551) PDF downloads(55) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return