Volume 39 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Ge-yan, WANG Yu-qian, HUANG Yin-shu, SHENG Zhi-yi, HUANG Xiao, CHEN Qi-bin, JIANG Ming-yan. Landscape Evaluation and Reconstruction Strategies of Scenic Recreation Bamboo Forests in Southwest China[J]. JOURNAL OF BAMBOO RESEARCH, 2020, 39(2): 66-73.
Citation: LIU Ge-yan, WANG Yu-qian, HUANG Yin-shu, SHENG Zhi-yi, HUANG Xiao, CHEN Qi-bin, JIANG Ming-yan. Landscape Evaluation and Reconstruction Strategies of Scenic Recreation Bamboo Forests in Southwest China[J]. JOURNAL OF BAMBOO RESEARCH, 2020, 39(2): 66-73.

Landscape Evaluation and Reconstruction Strategies of Scenic Recreation Bamboo Forests in Southwest China

  • Received Date: 2020-02-28
    Available Online: 2021-04-29
  • Publish Date: 2021-04-29
  • Taking the bamboo forest scenic area in Southwest China as the research object, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP method) was used to construct an index system with 5 criterion levels and 20 indicators to evaluate the landscape of scenic bamboo forests. The layer weight is the aesthetic index of the forest (0.2864) > the health index of the bamboo forest (0.2442) > the structure index of the forest (0.1769) > the characteristic index of the understory (0.1663) > the bamboo measurement index (0.1262). The beauty degree evaluation (SBE) was conducted,and the correlation between the category level of the main influencing indicators (visibility, lodging degree, standing bamboo density, understory uniformity, average height under the first branch) in each criterion level and the value of bamboo forest beauty was studied. The results showed that people preferred the bamboo forests with the first branching height above 5.5 m, the bamboo density of 6 000~12 000 plants·hm-2 for scattered bamboos and 700~1 100 clusters·hm-2 for clumping bamboos, and almost no lodging or lodging number ≤2 plants, neat understory,and visibility more than 20 m. Thus, suggestions for improving the landscape of the scenic bamboo forests were proposed.
  • loading
  • [1]
    杨鹏,薛立,陈红跃.森林景观评价方法[J].广东园林,2003(1):24-27.
    [2]
    Terry C. Daniel, R. S. B. Measuring Landscape Esthetics:The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method[M].1976.
    [3]
    Daniel, T. C., & Schroeder, H. Scenic beauty estimation model:predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes[J]. Environment, 1979,35:514-523. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237671129.
    [4]
    陆兆苏,赵德海,赵仁寿,等.南京市钟山风景区森林经理的实践和研究[J].华东森林经理,1991,5(1):1-6

    ,19.
    [5]
    陈勇,孙冰,廖绍波,等.深圳市城市森林林内景观的美景度评价[J].林业科学,2014,50(8):39-44.
    [6]
    Chiang Y C, Li D, Jane H A. Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2017, 167:72-83.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.001.
    [7]
    陈鑫峰,王雁.森林美剖析——主论森林植物的形式美[J].林业科学,2001,37(2):122-130

    ,147-148.
    [8]
    董建文,翟明普,徐程杨,等.京郊侧柏刺槐混交林植物物种组成特征对林内景观美景度的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2007,29(5):756-761.
    [9]
    艾婧文,刘健,余坤勇,等.群落特征和林分空间结构对森林公园景观美学质量贡献率及影响因子[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(6):1087-1094.
    [10]
    梁爽,张洁,戚继忠,等.次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6):119-124.
    [11]
    史琛媛,路亚星,刘佳,等.抚育间伐对冀北山地华北落叶松生态景观林林内美景度的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2016,39(3):66-72.
    [12]
    李俊英,闫红伟,唐强,等.沈阳森林植物群落结构与其林内景观美学质量关系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):212-219.
    [13]
    穆艳,张景群.太白山森林公园主要林型林内景观的定量评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(6):119-125.
    [14]
    Wang Z, Li M, Zhang X, et al. Modeling the scenic beauty of autumnal tree color at the landscape scale:A case study of Purple Mountain, Nanjing, China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 47:126526. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126526.
    [15]
    李苹,毛斌,许丽娟,等.密度、灌草盖度和树干形态对油松人工风景林林内景观指数的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(10):115-122.
    [16]
    史琛媛,张志伟,魏浩亮,等.冀北山地不同疏伐密度下油松风景林美景度的研究[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(4):335-339.
    [17]
    Mao B, Gong L, Xu C. Evaluating the scenic beauty of individual trees:a case study using a nonlinear model for a Pinus tabulaeformis scenic forest in Beijing, China[J]. Forests, 2015,6:1933-1948. DOI: 10.3390/f6061933.
    [18]
    Hull R B, Buhyoff G J, Cordell H K. Psychophysical models:an example with scenic beauty perceptions of roadside pine forests[J]. Landscape Journal, 1987, 6(2):113-122.
    [19]
    毛斌,徐程扬,李翠翠,等.不同修枝强度对侧柏、油松人工林林内景观美景度的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(3):123-125

    ,205.
    [20]
    尚晓娜,何雨,方萍.中国竹林资源旅游价值及景区开发探讨[J].世界林业研究,2013,26(5):69-74.
    [21]
    Jia Qi Yuen, Tak Fung, Alan D. Ziegler. Carbon stocks in bamboo ecosystems worldwide:Estimates and uncertainties[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017,393:113-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.017.
    [22]
    吴继林,郭起荣.中国竹类资源与分布[J].纺织科学研究,2017(3):76-78.
    [23]
    李光耀.基于BIB-LCJ的竹类植物景观形象审美评价[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(1):167-170.
    [24]
    杨小可.南方竹林景观质量评价体系研究[D].福建农林大学,2017.
    [25]
    刘永红,张艳峰,周围,等.竹林景观美学价值研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011,31(3):187-190.
    [26]
    周荣伍,安玉涛,马润国,等.风景林概念及其研究现状[J].林业科学,2013,49(8):117-125.
    [27]
    蔡小虎,马吉才,吴雪仙,等.风景林研究概述[J].四川林业科技,2014,35(6):27-31.
    [28]
    梁泰然.中国竹林类型与地理分布特征[J].竹子研究汇刊, 1990,9(4):1-16.
    [29]
    Takashi Awano. An evaluation of the intrinsic value of the takada pine forest (Takakada-no-Matsubara) as a scenic beauty spot in Japan[J]. Urpr, 2015, 2:18-30. DOI: 10.14398/urpr.2.18.
    [30]
    毛斌,徐程扬,陈瑜,等.AHP法在风景林林内景观质量评价中的应用[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(3):204-209.
    [31]
    夏莲.AHP法在莽山森林公园林内景观质量评价中的应用[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(1):86-90.
    [32]
    余国锋.毛竹林雪灾后恢复与重建调查分析[J].现代农业科技,2015(7):186-187.
    [33]
    戴菲,章俊华.规划设计学中的调查方法3——心理实验[J].中国园林,2009,25(1):100-103.
    [34]
    Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes.[J]. Archieves of Psychology, 1932, 22(140):1-55.
    [35]
    陈勇,孙冰,廖绍波,等.城市森林林内景观评价指标筛选研究[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(16):32-36.
    [36]
    邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
    [37]
    王雁,陈鑫峰.心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用[J].林业科学,1999,35(5):110-117.
    [38]
    王冰,宋力.景观美学评价中心理物理学方法的理论及其应用[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(12):3531-3532.
    [39]
    Daniel T C, Boster R S. Measuring landscape esthetics:the scenic beauty estimation method[J]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper.1976, RM-167. DOI: https://dx-doi-org.webvpn.sicau.edu.cn/.
    [40]
    Ribe R G. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest:The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(1):245-260.
    [41]
    方智果,宋昆,叶青.芦原义信街道宽高比理论之再思考——基于"近人尺度"视角的街道空间研究[J].新建筑,2014(5):136-140.
    [42]
    刘翔,邹志荣.园林景观空间尺度的视觉性量化控制[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(7):2757-2758.
    [43]
    王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于SBE法的城郊森林公园森林林内景观美学质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(1):308-314.
    [44]
    周阳超,王瑞辉,周璞,等.基于SBE法的湖南大围山白檀林春季景观质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2019,34(2):263-268.
    [45]
    李效文,卢翔,潘凤跃,等.温州山地风景林景观质量评价研究[J].林业科技,2017,42(6):34-36.
    [46]
    李翠翠.京郊典型风景游憩林林内景观质量评价技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.
    [47]
    谷晓萍,殷有,于丽芬,等.棋盘山风景区森林风景资源质量评价研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(3):46-52.
    [48]
    翁殊斐,朱锦心,苏志尧,等.岭南地区滨水绿地植物景观质量评价[J].林业科学,2017,53(1):20-27.
    [49]
    王美婷,孙冰,陈雷,等.广州市典型性城市公园植物景观美景度研究[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(3):501-510.
    [50]
    张洁,魏进华,徐程扬,等.东北次生林森林公园林内景观质量提升技术[J].北方园艺,2017(1):65-69.
    [51]
    李效文,贾黎明,郝小飞,等.森林景观SBE评价方法[J].中国城市林业,2007,5(3):33-36.
    [52]
    邓必平,罗杰.基于SBE法的阳岭国家森林公园毛竹林景观评价研究[J].中国林副特产,2018(6):26-28,32.
    [53]
    Zhao J, Xu W, Li R. Visual preference of trees:The effects of tree attributes and seasons[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 25:19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.015.
    [54]
    Guan H,Wei H,He X,et al. The tree-species-specific effect of forest bathing on perceived anxiety alleviation of young-adults in urban forests[J].Annals of Forest Research,2017,60(2):327-341.
    [55]
    董建文,章志都,许贤书.福建省山地坡面风景游憩林单因素美景度评价研究[J].东北林业大学学报.2010,38(4):45-480.
    [56]
    Lee K J,Hur J,Yang K S,et al. Acute biophysical responses and psychological effects of different types of forests in patients with metabolic syndrome[J].Environment and Behavior,2017, 50(2):001391651770095.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3982) PDF downloads(193) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return